Talk:Assassination of Mohamad Chatah
![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Assassination of Mohamad Chatah, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alleged Hezbollah involvement
[edit]I put Hezbollah as the suspected perpetrators (widely accused by various opposition members in Lebanon). Certainly it is not officially a "perpetrator" until some proves are given or Hezbollah admits it (i doubt they ever do it).GreyShark (dibra) 11:06, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
References to potentially add
[edit]- Lebanese opposition calls for investigation into Chatah murder
- Lebanon: Chatah’s funeral held after car bomb
- Stories of innocent lives lost begin to emerge
- Chatah's assassination marks rise of extremism
- Blast in Hezbollah-run area of Beirut kills 5
Plot Spoiler (talk) 01:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
removing content
[edit]If you look article history you'll see now one israeli editor is removing sourced content and desperately wants to accuse Hezbollah. We're all well familiar with Wahhabi-Israeli friendship, but keep in mind that Shias and Christians don't share their ways so their opinions should be represented also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.239.0.37 (talk) 03:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment on content, not the contributor. Cease your WP:Personal attacks - claiming I am Israeli that is promoting some kind of "Wahhabi-Israeli friendship".
- http://lubpak.com and a fringe commentator at the questionable Iranian government outlet PressTV are not WP:RS.
- Labeling the March 14 Movement as "pro-Saudi" is WP:NPOV well-poisoning. Plot Spoiler (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Answers:
- There's more then obivous you're trying to present only pro-Saudi and anti-Hezbollah view.
- Lubpak contains article written by journalist Laleen Ahmad, he also write for Daily Star from Lebanon and his other article is already included.
- There's absolutely no rule that Press TV "isn't reliable source", it's your own personal and political view. I already saw hardcore Zionists complained about PressTV because it offers completely different view, but Wikipedia isn't Zionist outlet and it should present all views. PressTV, Daily Star, Haaretz, etc. "IJustDontLikeIt" isn't good excuse for manipulating with Wiki policies. Press TV is cited in more then 1000 Wiki articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=presstv.com&title=Special%3ASearch
- Denial that March 14 movement is pro-Saudi is ridiculous, there's million sources for it, even statements from their politicians. Leading politician of that coalition is Saudi-Lebanese citizen born and living at the moment in Saudi Arabia. The same goes for pro-Iranian March 8 movement which contains Hezbollah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.165.157.220 (talk) 04:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)