Talk:Assault Craft Unit 5

Untitled

No introductory paragraph, no idea what Assault Craft Unit 5 is (as an outsider), far less than 500 words. Needs a lot of content added. Seth4404 (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Good start, great pictures on the right, however needs more content and sources. As for your subject heading History and Amphibious Assault sound to broad you should limit them. Asoldavini (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments

The article has good pictures and the info box has good information but there needs to be more information in the subject headings. I am also unable to see your references due to errors while citing. There is not a lead paragraph. The article looks good but needs a little more work.Kyle285 (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

peer review

1. ompleteness:

   500 words per person:  no, only 87
   Lead Paragraph: missing
   4 Sections of content: 4 sections, not all with content 
   Minimum ammount of citations: No citation
   Images: Complete 

2. Evaluation of Resources:

   Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority? No citation
   Are the sources listed in the References of accurate? No citation 
   Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? No

3. Readability & Content:

   Is the information being presented factual in nature? Yes
   Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) No
   Does the article flow effectively? Not enough information to tell
   Does the article feeling like it is missing content? yes

Huenemet (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer review

◦Not 500 words per ◦Lead Paragraph:

◦Not 4 Sections of content:

◦No Minimum ammount of citations:

◦Images: very nice

No References at all

Peer Review

Great looking set up, now you just need the information so that you can fill out the boxes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdowell92 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

No content for me to read — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dscma (talk • contribs) 15:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review

1. Does not meet the requirement of 500 words. There is no introductory paragraph and also there isn't 4 different sections of work. There are no citations.

2. I can't look at the references because there are none.

3. There are only like 3 sentences on the page and you need to add info.

Asingh247 (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)A.J Singh Completeness:

   500 words per person:No
   Lead Paragraph:No
   4 Sections of content:No
   Minimum ammount of citations: No
   Images:Yes

Evaluation of Resources:

   Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority?Yes
   Are the sources listed in the References of accurate?Yes
   Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles?Yes

Readability & Content:

   Is the information being presented factual in nature? Yes
   Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias) Yes
   Does the article flow effectively? Yes
   Does the article feeling like it is missing content? Yes

You definitely have a better look going more than infromation, all you have to do is add information. Make sure you integrate your sources into this article. I would say you have the "friendliest" appearance of this article I have seen thus far, it will be interesting to read.

  Dmitry Borovkov

Peer Review

1.Completeness:Not completed yet.

◦500 words per person:Did not get 500 words yet.

◦Lead Paragraph:There is none

◦4 Sections of content:Yes but need to be filled in

◦Minimum ammount of citations:NO

◦Images:Yes

2.Evaluation of Resources:

◦Are the sources listed in the References of sufficient authority?NOt yet

◦Are the sources listed in the References of accurate?not yes cited

◦Conduct searches of the topic yourself. Do you feel like the authors found worth while articles or just easily available articles? Yes i do

3.Readability & Content:

◦Is the information being presented factual in nature? I think it is

◦Is the information being presented objective? (No Bias)Yes but need more of it.

◦Does the article flow effectively? Not yet, there is barely an article

◦Does the article feeling like it is missing content?yes very much soo — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinB359 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at California Maritime Academy supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)