Talk:At the Hub/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Overlinking
There is entirely way too much linking in this article. I believe I can count on both hands how many words in the article are NOT linked, either blue-linked or red-linked. WP:OVERLINKING goes into this a lot more. Right now this page is an absolute mess to be honest. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Grammatical nightmare
I'm having trouble reading this article. Are the editors skilled in the English language? Is this translated from Hebrew?
- Best Regards,
- Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 01:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Metropolitan90, good thing you figured out what was going on. Another saved article!
- Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 03:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Basically, the problem was that an editor was apparently unfamiliar with the guideline against overlinking. After it was brought to their attention, they agreed to stop doing that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 03:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Metropolitan90, good thing you figured out what was going on. Another saved article!
- Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 01:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
You can fix any grammatical errors you see, yet, I see no reason to delete the article, as, it is entirely bakced up by reliable sources--79.178.24.71 (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- I have decimated most of the excessive punctuation. Please tell what do you consider to be biased about the article, which further grammatical or stylistic issues need to be addressed, which links do you believe need to be removed, etc., and, I'll see what I can do. Please also tell when can the talks be archived. Thanks.--79.178.24.71 (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)