Talk:Athletic Ground (Scarborough)

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Athletic Ground (Scarborough) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Athletic Ground (Scarborough)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

History section required
Pictures of stands, general ground view

Keith D 20:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 23:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed move

I propose moving this article to Athletic Ground (Scarborough), which currently redirects here. Normal practice is to use traditional names, where one exists, rather than sponsored ones, e.g. Pride Park Stadium or Almondvale Stadium. The ground was known as the Athletic Ground for the majority of its existence. I think that what has happened here is that the McCain name was a particularly early example of a sponsored ground name, in the UK a least; and in an earlier Wikipedia age, the article was created under the then-current name, when consensus on these cases probably hadn't developed. Jellyman (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given the lack of response, I am going to submit a formal move request on this basis. Jellyman (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ground Pictures

Any chance someone could some upload pictures of the ground, when it was at its best?...for example vs Chelsea FA Cup tie 2004, 4th round, glorious day, a full house, national TV there etc? I understand the photographs of it falling to bits, given that it currently (October 2016) is being razed to the ground (for a Lidl), but it's ironic that just when the stadium was a neat complete little arena, the club slipped down the leagues & was liquidated! The new club Scarborough Athletic F.C. is moving to a new ground at Weaponness in 2017, it would be great to see some warm memories of the McCain (Athletic Ground) on here.

Requested move 20 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. There is consensus to move here, and the rationale that "Athletic Ground" was used for the majority of the stadium's existence is a good one. However, just to be clear, it should be noted that the so-called "consensus" at WP:FOOTY does not trump WP:COMMONNAME and other article titling policies, and the fact that a name is a sponsorship title is never a valid reason to reject it on its own. See for example Emirates Stadium and Ricoh Arena. — Amakuru (talk) 13:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

McCain Stadium → Athletic Ground (Scarborough) – Football consensus is to use traditional names, where one exists, rather than sponsored ones (e.g. City of Manchester Stadium or Almondvale Stadium). The ground was known as the Athletic Ground for the majority of its existence. I think that what has happened here is that the McCain name was a particularly early example of a sponsored ground name, in the UK a least; and in an earlier Wikipedia age, the article was created under the then-current name, when consensus on these cases probably hadn't developed. Jellyman (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support per long-standing consensus re avoidance of sponsor names where possible. Number 5 7 09:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support move per precedent. ONR (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and above. Does this consensus apply to other sports, and is there a link to the consensus decision? Would be nice to reapply the original names to some American baseball stadium pages. Randy Kryn 12:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: See WP:FOOTY discussion here, here and here. This, of course, applies only to football; I'm unaware if similar consensus exists elsewhere. Jellyman (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll read those later. Would be nice if it applied to American baseball, golfing events, etc. Recently a golf-related RM closed with Los Angeles Open being moved back to its original name. Randy Kryn 13:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Athletic Ground (Scarborough). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]