Talk:Attacks on the Sounion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Attacks on the Sounion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yemen Low‑importance

	Yemen portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Requested move 25 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Attacks on the Sounion (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Red Sea oil spill → ? – Other oil spills occurred in the Red Sea this year, such as the Rubymar and Chios Lion, making the current title ambiguous. I think that the title should be changed into something more precise, such as August 2024 Red Sea oil spill or Attacks on the MT Delta Sounion. Chomik! (talk?) 13:30, 25 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 14:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move: Those are good points, and I think that both options you suggested would be good. The former I think describes the situation more overall later on, while the latter might be more fitting for now until news reports of clear oil spill with a prominent slick appear, so I can move it to that one for now. One other possible title later on could be something like MT Delta Sounion oil spill akin to the title of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Thank you, I appreciate your feedback and points of consideration! Noble Attempt (talk) 04:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move: The ship's name is just Sounion (corrected in the article, except for the page title, pending consensus here). If the ship variant is chosen, it should be just Sounion oil spill, but I am not opposed to August 2024 Red Sea oil spill. - Davidships (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move: This article is about an attack on a ship at sea. Since applying the naming convention for events gives ambiguous results, the article should not be named after the place where it happened but about the ship itself. The ship's name, which is apparently MT Delta Sounion, and is currently a redirect, is probably the best title. This means the attack on the ship and the subsequent oil spill can all be covered in the same article along with the rest of the ship's history. This avoids having too many content forks, as all the information is in one article. Also, articles about ships that result in them sinking have been described as "Sinking of the <ship>". e.g. Sinking of the Titanic, Sinking of the Edmund Fitzgerald, Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, Sinking of the RMS Lusitania, etc. If this ship sinks, that gives a second naming option, other possible titles, such as "Attack on ... " or "Destruction of ... " may be apparent from sources. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 19:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving it to Attacks on the MT Delta Abo Yemen ✉ 10:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to repeat this but the name of the tanker is just Sounion. Almost all the references have it correctly, and it is corroborated by the owner, MarineTraffic, Equasis and all the photos I can find - Davidships (talk) 13:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. ill go with the August 2024 Red Sea oil spill option then Abo Yemen ✉ 13:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the shipping line is called Delta tankers and a number of other ships of the line have the prefix "Delta ...", but this ship is only called "Sounion". The "MT" designates the type of ship, in this case an oil tanker. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving to Attacks on the MT Delta Sounion. The battle between the tankers armed guards and the Houthi fast attack craft is in itself notable, and there are other details that should be added to the article like the subsequent engagement when the French frigate rendering assistance attacked and destroyed an approaching Houthi explosive boat.XavierGreen (talk) 03:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment - there's a clear consensus to move, but it would be good to get some more definitive agreement on what exactly to move to. — Amakuru (talk) 14:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Attacks on the Sounion. Consistent with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events)#Maritime, which does not seem to include the ship's classification abbreviation before the name. Delta does not seem to be part of the name. Per WP:NOYEAR, the event is unlikely to recur in a future year that would give rise to a separate article, so the year should be omitted. I think pluralizing attacks is probably best given the gap between the 21 and 23 August occurrences. --Bsherr (talk) 12:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

move There is not oil spill and may never be one, firstly. Secondly, as mentioned variously above, attack on the ship would make more sense. 1 of 3 biggest attacks by yemen in the last 9 or so month is highly notable.Sportsnut24 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Attacks on the MT Sounion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support naming the article Attacks on the Sounion as proposed by Bsherr. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that Attacks on the Sounion best meets WP:PRECISE and WP:CONCISE. - Davidships (talk) 19:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Shouldn't this article list general information on the ship like the Tutor and Rubymar articles do?

Things like port of registry, identification, gross tonnage, size, launch date, etc D1d2d3d29 (talk) 13:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, but without excessive detail, to keep it proportional on the page (assuming that the "oilspill infobox" will remain at the head of the article, as with Attacks on the MV Tutor). - Davidships (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On an article about the MT Sounian, yes. Like the Rubymar.Sportsnut24 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oil spill section

How can there even be a section on somethiing that has neither happened nor may not. Maybe an analysis section after the reactions on concerns thereof.Sportsnut24 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]