Jump to content

Talk:Attensity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Hi, everyone. Took a look this morning at the new article I wrote last night. Unlike the old, deleted article (that I remember last time I was doing research on text analytics), this one -- is shorter and includes references. I'm curious what about the new one seems promotional. Any claims, such as "almost instantly," come from the text of articles in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, or other publications. Also, the point of view appears to be neutral given the absence of marketing claims and superlatives. Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks! --Kawika (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Attensity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]