Jump to content

Talk:Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 28 April 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



A-G for Hong Kong v ReidAttorney-General for Hong Kong v Reid – Unnecessary abbreviation. The target's history is trivial but still blocked an unprivileged move. Hairy Dude (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous move

[edit]
23:17, 4 December 2014‎ Good Olfactory talk contribs block‎  54 bytes +54‎  Good Olfactory moved page Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid to A-G for Hong Kong v Reid: name of case per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Legal#Article_titles; following OSCOLA

That is certainly a well presented rationale and food for thought! But OSCOLA seems irrelevant. The application of the MOS is unclear to me here, but if it supports that move then IMO it is just plain wrong and needs tweaking. Andrewa (talk) 18:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.