Talk:Auckland Central in the 2020 New Zealand general election
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Auckland Central in the 2020 New Zealand general election appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 23:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Chlöe Swarbrick won the race for Auckland Central in the 2020 New Zealand general election, the first time a Green candidate had won an electorate without major party endorsement?
- Source: "The Green MP was still pinching herself today after claiming her party's second-ever electorate seat and the first without a major party endorsement." link
- Reviewed:
Created by TheLoyalOrder (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
TheLoyalOrder (talk) 10:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC).
- Reviewing this. On first look, the "Declined" section has to have a ref. I suppose the "Declared" section does not need a separate ref as those are the same people in the "Results" section but other people may think otherwise. In the "Background" section, the background ref has to have a ref on electoral system. Full review to come later. Howard the Duck (talk) 04:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Kia ora, I have done the things in this comment.TheLoyalOrder (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, due to unforeseen personal circumstances, I won't be able to continue the review. Howard the Duck (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I'd be interested in taking over this review if needed @Howard the Duck:. Ornithoptera (talk) 07:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, no worries! Howard the Duck (talk) 11:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I'd be interested in taking over this review if needed @Howard the Duck:. Ornithoptera (talk) 07:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, due to unforeseen personal circumstances, I won't be able to continue the review. Howard the Duck (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Kia ora, I have done the things in this comment.TheLoyalOrder (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Full review needed; Ornithoptera, are you still interested in doing one? BlueMoonset (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, my apologies BlueMoonset, been away from Wiki a bit due to a loss in the family. Since things have winded down, I'll try and look at the article later this week. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. Ornithoptera (talk) 00:27, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ornithoptera: This is the second oldest fully unreviewed nom and I unexpectedly need a second QPQ (ironically for Gigi Perez, who went viral for a song about her late sister!). Do you still plan on reviewing this or should I take over, probably tomorrow?--Launchballer 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Launchballer, it seems like you needed a second QPQ so you're more than welcome to take over, my apologies for the delay. The loss in the family has affected a lot of my concentration more than I would have expected as of late. Cheers Ornithoptera (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Ornithoptera: This is the second oldest fully unreviewed nom and I unexpectedly need a second QPQ (ironically for Gigi Perez, who went viral for a song about her late sister!). Do you still plan on reviewing this or should I take over, probably tomorrow?--Launchballer 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @TheLoyalOrder: I've tried to review this a few times, but I can't get past the fact that the Background section goes into way too much detail for a daughter article (to give one example out of several, content about the electorate should be at Auckland Central). Please cut this right down. When you've done that, I'll try again.--Launchballer 10:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @TheLoyalOrder: Please address the above.--Launchballer 10:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok I removed some detail TheLoyalOrder (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did say 'one example out of several' and I don't fancy getting into a WP:FIXLOOP, so I've cut it down myself. This article is long enough and new enough. I think "the Greens hovering around the 5" should be reworded and I'd like to see a hook that doesn't describe a basic feature of politics, though I don't see a need for any other maintenance templates or a QPQ.--Launchballer 09:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- I reworded the "Greens hovering around the 5" section. tbh I like the current hook, I disagree that its " a basic feature of politics" given it was a first. I guess an alternative could be:
- ALT1 "... that Chlöe Swarbrick won the race for Auckland Central in 2020, during which she held a drag show as a campaign event?"
- TheLoyalOrder (talk) 02:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fine by me.--Launchballer 09:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- @TheLoyalOrder: Please address the above.--Launchballer 10:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class New Zealand articles
- Mid-importance New Zealand articles
- B-Class New Zealand politics articles
- Mid-importance New Zealand politics articles
- WikiProject New Zealand articles
- B-Class WikiProject Auckland articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Auckland articles
- B-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles