Talk:Australian contribution to the Battle of Normandy/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 09:37, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals one error:
- Herington_131 (Multiple references are using the same name)
  - Fixed
Disambiguations: no dab links [3].
Linkrot: External links check out [4] (no action required).
Alt text: image lacks alt text so you might consider adding it [5] (suggestion only).
Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool is currently not working, however spot checks (on Long 1973) reveal no issues [6] (no action required).

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
- "...but its crew survived and were evacuated back to the UK", perhaps more simply "but its crew survived and were evacuated to the UK..." (very minor point - suggestion only).
  - Done
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- All major points are refenced to reliable sources.
- Citations use a consistent style.
- No issues with OR.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
- All major aspects appear to have been covered.

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- Looks fine IMO.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
- No issues. Images are all PD and appropriate for the article.

Overall:
a Pass/Fail:
- This is an excellent article IMO. One citation error and a minor prose suggestion; however, nothing to prevent its promotion. Well done. Anotherclown (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks a lot for the careful review. Nick-D (talk) 10:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]