Talk:Australian snubfin dolphin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nicole wilson97, Mschouwe. Peer reviewers: Annabelle howe, Juliaeamaral, Cdurhamv.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TODOs[edit]

Someone should add a range map to this article.

Very interesting![edit]

More information about the description and size of the animal would be helpful if there Is available data. Annabelle howe (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What color(s)?[edit]

What color is this animal? The image on the article makes it appear pink-orange, but I'm guessing that's a trick of the light. --FOo 06:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Australian Snubfin Dolphin is dark brown on the top, a lighter brown on the sides, and a white belly. Use this link (DNA samples reveal new dolphin species)and click on the picture at the top right corner of the page to get a good look at the Australian Snubfin. YIGMoA 01:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 03:20, 14 March 2006[reply]

Awesome![edit]

I think this is awesome that they found another species.

Nothing completely new under the sun[edit]

Channel 10 News Sydney on 1 August 2008 showed some good film taken by a wildflife department study group, of the dolphin sticking its distinct head out of the water, a few hundred metres from a city (probably Townsville -- hardly remote). The accompanying commentary by the reporter unfortunately gave the impression that the animal had just been discovered and up till now was completely unknown. As the article makes clear, it has been known to science for 44 years, but until three years ago was thought to be another species. I'll bet though that Aboriginal peoples in nothern Australia, especially those that hunt the manatee, have always known of this dolphin and have a name for it. If anyone can verify this and give some local names it would be useful addition to the article. Strayan (talk) 00:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CETA capitalisation discussion[edit]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Australian snubfin dolphin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: BIOE 129[edit]

It might be helpful to elaborate further on the "Irrawaddy dolphin" in the lead. It would also be helpful to more the description section about the snubfin to before the taxonomy. It would link together the connections between the Irrawaddy and snubfin mentioned in the lead.

The first sentence of the second paragraph of the taxonomy section sounds a little too casual, as well as opinion based. Last sentence of this paragraph also has the same problem.

More information should be added to the life history section, potentially reproduction information, if available.