Talk:Avery–MacLeod–McCarty experiment
![]() | Avery–MacLeod–McCarty experiment has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 5, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1944 Avery-MacLeod-McCarty experiment, later celebrated for showing that DNA is the genetic material, challenged the prevailing wisdom that genes were made of protein? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Images?
[edit]It would be a good idea I think to get a few images into this article before it hits the main page. I'm sure there are plenty of copyright-free illustrations of DNA etc. Could someone who knows the material have a look? Gracias, the skomorokh 14:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've added some images; one of macroscopic DNA (since that's how they worked with it and the strucutre was still unknown), and one of Griffith's experiment, which is closely connected.--ragesoss (talk) 17:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Muchas gracias; is it possible to link the captions more explicitly with the images? the skomorokh 17:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- How's that?--ragesoss (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- A lot more helpful for the scientifically impaired! Mahalo, the skomorokh 17:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- How's that?--ragesoss (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Muchas gracias; is it possible to link the captions more explicitly with the images? the skomorokh 17:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Experiment!
[edit]this experiment was based on radioactivity. Radiolabelled Sulpher and Phosphrus was used to findout the nature of genetic material. As Phosphorus is present in DNA/RNA as it get rediolabelled by P34 and Cellwall consist of Sulpher, so S42 was used in this experiment. Both show reaction on radioactivity test. so we can find it out that what is going in next generation and what not.
Avaneesh Dwivedi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.141.106.117 (talk) 10:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think you're referring to the Hershey-Chase experiment here. That was done about 10 years later, on viruses. ·Arianwen· (talk) 15:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
As far as I can see (perhaps I'm too sleepy to notice) there is nothing in the article on the experiment itself... which would be a major failing. I remember it was something along the lines of "dead S + proteases" + live R ==> transformation still occurs; repeat with lipase, RNAase, carboase... ==> transformation still occurs; only with DNAase does transformation not occur.
I will try to look into it, but if anyone else has the time, go forth and conquer!
·Arianwen· (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. Looks like some vandalism or experimental edits slipped through, and several sections were removed. I've restored them.
File:Pneumococcus colony.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Pneumococcus colony.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC) |