Talk:Aviation Week & Space Technology

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Espionage Low‑importance

	Aviation Week & Space Technology is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Military history: Aviation / Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Untitled[edit]

It really is often known as 'Aviation Leak and Space Mythology'.

I'm rvving your rvv.

Sukiari 00:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't doubt that it's got nicknames like that (the "Space Mythology" part isn't common, but "AvLeak" is extremely common slang in the industry...). You're putting it in the wrong place. See the middle of the second paragraph.

It's important not to unbalance an article by putting less-important info right at the beginning. The nicknames are less-important. Georgewilliamherbert 01:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This name is bogus. It's not very common (certainly far less common than "AvLeak") and it only generates 17 Google hits, some of which merely point back to here. 65.166.89.2 14:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would help is there was some idea of when publication started. I can remember seeing mentions of it in 1977. Was it once just "Aviation Week"? Some of the slangy renaming may never have popped up on the internet for Google to see. 85.211.74.52 (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A total train wreck of an article.99.229.67.132 (talk) 00:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been reading it since 1958 and have been a subscriber almost forever. AvLeak is the common nickname, but Aviation Week and Space Mythology has been around for many decades.

Mark Lincoln (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aviation Week & Space Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141101061641/http://www.lockheedmartin.co.uk/us/news/features/2013/sr-72.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.co.uk/us/news/features/2013/sr-72.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]