Talk:BD Wong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

use of term "openly gay"[edit]

Is the term "openly" superfluous in this (and other) articles? I would assume that if someone is identified publicly, such as in Wikipedia, as "gay", it's assumed that the person identifies as such, and is therefore "openly" gay. Perhaps this should be a case in which we simply use the word "gay", and if someone is not "out of the closet", terminology should simply indicate that there is speculation that someone is gay, with citations, of course.

The use of "openly gay" does indicate, to me, that there is some shame in being gay, and therefore someone who is "openly gay" has chosen to escape this shame. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Redheaded dude (talk • contribs) 18:00, 5 March 2006.

I realize that this was an incredibly old comment, but since the text is still there, I thought it might be best to include a response (just to discourage anyone from removing the line in the future).
It is true that Wikipedia typically only identifies people as being gay if they admit it themselves (and rightly so). However, there are two things to keep in mind:
First off, the average reader may not necessarily know that.
Second, and I think this may be more pertinent... There are some actors (well, and people in general) who either start off "in the closet", or who are even 'outed' after their deaths. Similarly, some people "come out" even after eeeverybody knows that they're gay. I could (very easily) be wrong, but I don't see anything in the article to suggest that he's ever pretended to be straight, or been secretive about it. If that's false, then it may warrant rewording.
Anyways, just my take on it, for future reference. :) 209.90.135.148 (talk) 03:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's 2009, "gay" is sufficient. To add "openly" suggests there's something wrong with being gay, which is an offensive thing to suggest at this point. If there needs to be clarity around whether someone is in the closet, do it with exposition. 212.56.101.47 (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?: "He has since broken up with his partner and turned a 'straight' life" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.96.188.234 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 25 June 2006.

Openly is a nuance which culturally signifies more than just a state of being. In this case we have someone who uses their career and public image to support LGBT issues/causes. Someday it will indeed be absolutely no big deal to be LGBT but until then these nuances are made. -- Banjeboi 12:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I personally disagree with "openly" being offensive, but it is redundant to use "openly" here as if he wasn't an openly gay man, it wouldn't even be mentioned in the article. So either he's gay or not, not openly or straight, or in the closet. --Mike Allen talk · contribs 18:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bdwong.jpg[edit]

mispelling of vanity fair in photograph acknowledgement[edit]

Image:Bdwong.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on B. D. Wong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

B. D. or BD? Question at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard[edit]

See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BD_Wong_/_Name_Misspelled_in_Article_Headline. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BD_Wong&oldid=1209281704"