Talk:BGM-75 AICBM

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:BGM-75 AICBM/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Change the reference on aircraft designations to the one on missile designations.

   Done. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Not a whole lot here to cover, but it's comprehensive enough for what was actually done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Can someone explain me,

why this stub is a good article? --David.s.kats (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

• Because it isn't a stub. The article is over 1500 characters and has defined sections. Also, this is, literally (in the original sense of the term, as opposed to how it's often used nowadays), ALL the information that is available on this project. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

• I think that the article may not to up to GA standard, so I have started a GAR. Snowman (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Possible source

There may be something of use in this, used as a reference in the LGM-118 Peacekeeper. In addition, much of the background info from the Peacekeeper article seems equally applicable to this article.Nigel Ish (talk) 00:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BGM-75 AICBM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210145700/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123011845 to http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123011845

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)