Talk:Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Hi, check the spelling of Justice O'Connor's last name in your "case opinions" section. Cullen328 (talk) 23:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're making progress. Good. Cullen328 (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- You may want to add a brief summary of the case to Spotted Owl. Cullen328 (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent start. Keep up the good work. Cullen328 (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please also check Justice O'Connor's gender. Cullen328 (talk) 04:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent start. Keep up the good work. Cullen328 (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- You may want to add a brief summary of the case to Spotted Owl. Cullen328 (talk) 06:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Things to look out for.
[edit]This messege is directed to the students working on the article for Environmental Law 2 course, Slum125 and Kkihara. So far the article is coming along great, here are some things to look out for: - Make sure to fill in the missing sections for the parties involved - Reorganize the layout under the section labeled "Background". Perhaps add bullets points or subsections. - Remove the section labeled "importance" and figure how to incorporate it into one of the other sections. It think it can improve to overall look of the article.
Good luck and keep up the good work! Hle37 (talk) 23:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Hle37
Feedback
[edit]Hi Steph and Kimi - great job so far. Your article is appealing and well-designed. Just a few minor changes:
- The background section is a little confusing. I like how you used specific definitions but as a reader it was hard to follow, especially for the first paragraph. I would suggest describing the context and reasoning behind each definition then using the exact language to supplement your points.
- Under Parties: perhaps describe in more detail how and why the parties were claiming economic injuries. Since we're studying these issues I can only guess why but someone unfamilar with environmetal law may not understand.
- Under Issues section - I think this section can also be expanded and ties back to the economic injury issue. Try to state the point of view from each party in the lawsuit.
Other than that, great work! I especially like the pictures. See you on Saturday! Elsnthesea (talk) 13:43 4 May, 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit] This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of San Francisco supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Spring