Talk:Backmarking

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Complicated[edit]

Could anyone provide an example in this article or at least easier unterstandeable sentences? --84.147.52.62 (talk) 13:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid algorithmic descriptions usually have this dense language. Maybe you could start reading Backtracking; backmarking is basically the same algorithm with added information used to calculate some consistency checks that don't need to be repeated. What paragraphs of the article are you having more problems with? Diego (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

is it[edit]

... remembering where and how not to go : is a way to go ... (english sentence inspired by japanese language)84.16.123.194 (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]