Talk:Bacon Explosion/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 05:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: ChrisGualtieri (talk)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 05:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
None
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other GA)
![]() Check for WP:RS: Cross-checked with other GA: Baconnaise
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() (Thorough check on Google in parallel with criteria 2. Cross-checked with other GA: Baconnaise)
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) & (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:
The lead needs to be rewritten. Significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the body.Fix layout and WTW.Is this link " http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/can-bacon-be-part-of-a-healthy-diet" relevant to the article scope?
This article is a very promising GA nominee. I’m glad to see your work here. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 09:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hello! To address part of the second bullet (WTW), I changed the two instances of "noted" to "assessed" and "asserted," respectively. (Megatron Omega (talk) 06:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC))
- I worked on the lead and hopefully resolved the issue by covering the preparation and focusing more less on the details of the awards. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:52, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)