Talk:Bad Elk v. United States/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Buffbills7701 (talk · contribs) 21:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Comments[edit]
- Nicely cited.
- "...discuss the issue as defense against unlawful force, and most also note that a person may not use force to resist an unlawful arrest." Shouldn't most become must?
- The article states that in 1999, "sixteen states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest..." Is there a more recent version?
- Same thing with this line. "By 1999, twenty-three states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest by statute."
Addressing:
- "...discuss the issue as defense against unlawful force, and most also note that a person may not use force to resist an unlawful arrest." Shouldn't most become must?
- Done Clarified most to show that it meant "most of the cases" citing Bad Elk.
- The article states that in 1999, "sixteen states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest..." Is there a more recent version?
- Done.
- Same thing with this line. "By 1999, twenty-three states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest by statute."