Talk:Baer ring
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It might be better to assume unity[edit]
I have not really seen much evidence that any of these definitions are used in rings without unity. I'm not an operator theorist though, so it could be less rare than I think. If it really is uncommon, then it would seem better to avoid all the "if it has unity... if it has unity..." business. Frankly speaking, I feel like rings without unity are the exception, not the other way around. In any case I would be interested in suggested sources for Baer and Rickart rings without unity, and hearing the opinion from the rings without unity camp. Thanks, Rschwieb (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC) UPDATE: I notice Berberian's contains the phrase "without unity" in some exercises, but still here, it looks like they are only concerned with *-rings, where I gather the definitions are still left-right symmetric. Rschwieb (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)