Talk:Balanced trade

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 April 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Is this really significant[edit]

I havnt heard of many economists arguing this. Most understand that this is an impossibility as one country will be exporting and another will be importing. (Gibby 11:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I say delete it! (Gibby 11:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Impossible?[edit]

"Most understand that this is an impossiblity..." Where does this "most" come from?

Why is this article focused on just "...the surplus nation..." Why cannot a deficit nation take action? Why isn't the word tariff used?

This is not the best link but here is what one congressional condidate thinks the term balanced trade means. http://www.jackdavis.org/new/speeches/balanced.asp

--JayR 14:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for deletion[edit]

I've tagged this article for deletion, as it seems to be totally unimportrat. I've never heard a relivant reference to it and the article is uncited. Larklight (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Object to Deletion[edit]

This concept is related to dealing the "new normal" unemployment situation. Should be explored and expanded.Polecon (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

nnpov & desperately incomplete[edit]

NPOV|VERY one-sided; unbalanced, reads like an "advocacy"-piece AND totally lacking in the basic content required of any serious article about economics-theory

as an economics & trade article, it's a glorified, wordy "stub"

Lx 121 (talk) 10:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]