Talk:Bambra (surname)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 February 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
– It surprises me that the second page was not moved to this title before this SIA's creation per WP:PRECISION. The location in Australia more likely appears to be WP:PRIMARY. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Seems like there was no need to disambiguate the locality before the second page was created (just a few hours ago). Even though the locality is small and the article gets little traffic, I still feel it should have priority over such a short surname list. PC78 (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support Per PC78, although Australian places appear to include the state for reasons other than disambiguation, it seems its more likely than a surname with only 2 people (which wasn't even a valid article until I added content). Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support for reasons stated above. Bungle (talk • contribs) 14:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.