Talk:Bangkok Hilton

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangkok Hilton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bangkok Hilton is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Film: Australian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.

Hilton Hotels Corporation[edit]

Any info regarding the Hilton Hotels Corporation allowing its (persumably) trademarked name used in a movie title? --Kvasir 03:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Title question[edit]

Does anyone know if the nickname Bangkok Hilton was ever in use for any actual Bangkok prison prior to this work, or did this work invent that nickname. Ever since this series, news reports and TV documentaries usually seem pretty keen to describe whichever Bangkok prison they are reporting on (be it Chang Mai, Bangkwang, Klong Prem) as having the nickname "Bangkok Hilton". Now, the same nickname can't really be applied to three different places can it? Also, book The Damage Done uses only nickname "Big Tiger" to describe the Bangkwang prison, there is no mention of any "Bangkok Hilton" nickname. Asa01 20:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think what you're alluding to is correct. I've recently been looking for an answer to the same question and only see the term being used by the (mainly Australian) media in recent times and in reference to any and every Thai prison. -- Ian ≡ talk 00:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google News Archive http://news.google.com/archivesearch reveals no articles prior to 1989 using "Bangkok Hilton" in reference to a Bangkok prison. Format (talk) 07:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term ‘The Hilton’ or the ‘Such-and-such Hilton’, used to describe lock-ups, cheap rooming houses, unsavoury hostels or even low-class share-houses has been in use in Australian youth culture since at least the '60s. I'm unsure whether this is an Australianism or not; I have been unable to find any examples from other countries. The term is common enough to have influenced the producers, but it is also true that Thai prisons may have been referred to as the ‘Bangkok Hilton’ among Australian backpackers. 124.170.18.247 (talk) 04:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am a 41 year old Australian and have never heard this usage ever, and have never even heard of it - not even on Australian TV drama or in movies. I figured the writer of this miniseries was inspired by Hanoi Hilton actually. Format (talk) 08:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bangkok Hilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070327125453/http://travel.guardian.co.uk/article/2005/oct/23/thailand.darktourism.observerescapesection to http://travel.guardian.co.uk/article/2005/oct/23/thailand.darktourism.observerescapesection

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]