Talk:Bankra

Statistics disputed

Unless (as might be the case in India) there are very many persons who count as neither male nor female, the average literacy rate cannot be higher than both the male and female percentages--SilasW 15:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC) The article "Arambag" had similarly irreconcilable figures. My comment there led to deletion of all the literacy statistics. I follow that precedence and zap them from this article.--SilasW 13:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Well spotted. I think that was a problem with the calculations and wording used by a bot while creating the article or while adding demographic data. My understanding is that sexwise literacy numbers were calculated as #<male/female>literates/#total literates and by mistake of wording, it was claimed to be like 'x% of males are literate and (100-x)% of females are literate'; rather it should have been 'x% of literates are male and (100-x)% of literates are female'. Alternatively, other formulae should have been used. I have access to the data. So, I am putting it in correct words using %of literates among male/female. Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 12:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

No matter how the figures were derived they are manifest nonsense. A) 57 is less than 59.5 and B) if the population is roughly 50/50 M/F then the mean of 61 and 53 is 55 not 57. This arithmetical inconsistency can be found in other Indian town articles.Pls talk if you need to about the matter but not about my observing.--SilasW (talk) 11:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bankra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721000000/http://web.cmc.net.in/wbcensus/DataTables/01/Table-3.htm to http://web.cmc.net.in/wbcensus/DataTables/01/Table-3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

What's ward no of Bankra?

Please answer. 202.142.73.246 (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)