Talk:Banks dory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Changed Date[edit]

I changed the date of introduction of the Banks dory. The article said they came into being in the 16th century which is inaccurate. I changed the date to the 1850's and provided a reference. I could provide a lot more references for this if needed. I added a detail about the dories fitting inside each other (nesting) since this is really the key point of these boats. Nesting allowed a lot of them to be stored on the decks of fishing schooners. Without nesting there would be no fishing schooner/small boat style of fishing that the Bank dory was used for. I removed the reference to the Baquentine. The barquentine is not at all typical of the boats used on the Grand Banks despite what the article said (with no references). A typical fishing schooner carrying Bank style dories would be like this one in the Wikipedia gallery --Bcooke99 (talk) 11:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--- The connection with the Portugese Gazela was re-inserted. Bcooke99 (talk) 12:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV claims for Lowell's[edit]

The sources already in the article otherwise all support that mass production began at several locations, some before Lowell's. Anmccaff (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other types are now far more common, and were before the banker's heyday as well[edit]

Dory-fishing off of motherships declined beginning with WWI to near-nothingness by the '60s. Other dory types, working ad recreational, by contrast, have persisted. Anmccaff (talk) 05:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banks dory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion[edit]

Since neither AfD nor DRV have jurisdiction over this page, and the closing administrator has already properly withdrawn from the subsequent content dispute, this is (one of) the place(s) to determine consensus for a merge.  It is also interesting that no notice was posted on the AfD until the DRV discussion was complete.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:14, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]