Talk:Banksia caleyi/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 11:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Happy to offer a review. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- There's a little bit of inconsistency as to whether you provide metric/imperial conversations
- am tired, just read through and think they are all there (????) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- "can reach 4 cm long 2.5 cm high, and 2.5 cm wide", "up to 4 m have" and "roughly 7 cm in" are the ones I can see. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- am tired, just read through and think they are all there (????) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- "obovate" strikes me as jargon
- File:Banksia caleyi MHNT.BOT.2008.11.37.jpg- What am I looking at here?
- "South Stirling to the West River" Links?
- I wouldn't bother listing the publishers of journals, but if you want to, some consistency would be good.
- Is there a reason I've missed that you repeat your Weins et. al citation?
- Your Sweedman and Merrit source should probably have its title capitalised, and you're missing a publishing location
- You may want to think about rejigging the pictures- you trap some text between two pictures at the top of the article, you have lots of space in the middle and the bottom picture runs into the references (on my screen).
That's it- that's all I have. The pictures and sources are excellent, the writing is very strong, key questions are answered. I've made some fixes (please double-check, but I don't think they'll be controversial) but I'm happy to promote this immediatly, and leave my comments above as some bits to think on. Great work- I think this is only the second time I've done an "off the bat" promotion. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)