Talk:Bapatla railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bapatla railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Context is everything[edit]

This article should serve as an object lesson in how not to write an encyclopedia article about a railway station. It is a random collection of facts with no curation and no organization.

The lede describes nothing about the station, not even its location. The paragraph is filled with trivia about where it fits in the administrative hierarchy.

The Classification section provides no context whatsoever about ADARSH (what's that?), Category B (what does that mean to a reader?), or Model Station (Is that something to strive for?).

In the infobox, there is a wheelchair icon. That's a made up fact, likely false. The station has no lifts. Just because the icon is pretty is no reason to include it. It is also a violation of MOS:ICON Rhadow (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]