This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article has a basic error that is decisive for the whole decision: the claimants had also worked on a self-employed basis, and thus there was a probability that they themselves had caused their sickness! Thus, there is a decisive difference between Barker v. Corus and Fairchild. The article therefore needs to be amended, with regard both to the facts of the case as well as to the conclusion, which is materially wrong. C. Kruse
