Talk:Barnes rail crash

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / Operations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mispaced[edit]

I've moved this misplaced comment from the article to here: "There was a White Paper on the subject further information should be available from that." --Lexein 08:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passenger numbers[edit]

How can there have been 41 injuries when only ~35 passengers were on the train? --Redrose64 (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but that's what the official report says - approximately 35 passengers, of whom 11 were killed, 20 seriously injured, and 21 suffered "minor injuries and shock". The good Colonel's arithmetic skills must have been a litte rusty - or, perhaps, some of the 21 were passengers who were shocked by witnessing the accident but weren't on the train. I've changed the injuries figure to 20, so that it's at least not contradictory. Tevildo (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]