Jump to content

Talk:Baron Burghersh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Succession to the barony

[edit]

Leigh (or rather his source) is off the mark in both cases. The existence of Stephen de Burghersh is attested, and so the peerage of 1303 cannot have been extinct, only dormant. As for the 1330 creations, the attainder can't be ignored: Richard could have inherited nothing from his attainted father, and was never Baron Burghersh. Since the barony was never held again after 1409, unless we start explicitly tracking the heirs of peerages under attainder, etc., I'm going to roll back the changes. Choess 23:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]