Talk:Barteria fistulosa

A fact from Barteria fistulosa appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the tree Barteria fistulosa is associated with Tetraponera aethiops, an aggressive species of ant that lives in its hollow branches and twigs?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barteria fistulosa.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

... that the tree Barteria fistulosa is associated with Tetraponera aethiops, an aggressive species of ant that lives in its hollow branches and twigs?
ALT1 ... that the tree Barteria fistulosa is associated with Tetraponera aethiops, an aggressive species of ant that lives in its hollow branches and defends it from herbivorous insects?

Reviewed: William Ault Also reviewed Kissa Tanto
Comment: ~~Please don't review this too promptly as I plan to write an article for the ant species and add it to the hook. (I thought I had done this, but it turned out to be the wrong ant!)~~ Second article now written and added to hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Cwmhiraeth, review follows:

Barteria fistulosa: created 24 April, exceeds minimum length, article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources, no overly close paraphrasing noticed
Tetraponera aethiops: created 30 April, exceeds minimum length, article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources, no overly close paraphrasing noticed
General:hook is interesting, mentioned in both articles and backed up partly by an open source I could verify and partly by a paywalled source I will AGF on; two QPQs have been carried out. Looks good - Dumelow (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]