Jump to content

Talk:Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To Do

[edit]

I was rather unhappy with the state of this article. I believed the previous version neither accurately, nor sufficiently described the theory. I have attempted to improve the article, but there are several things that can be added:

  • A figure illustrating the model (I'm thinking something like figure 7.3 from Coybe and Orr).
  • A better description of the model, including the use of loci (Aa, Bb). I could just plagiarize the description in Coyne and Orr, but would rather not.
  • Better examples. Mules are not a valid example because infertility is cause by a difference in chromosome number between horse and donkey, not BDM interactions . I think there are papers (although not a lot) which claim to detail the discovery of BDM interactions in hybrid populations.

Dopeytaylor (talk) 21:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of reference to Heterozygosity

[edit]

I removed the statement "It assumes a selective pressure against a combination of alleles in the heterozygous state, i.e. F1 hybrids have reduced fertility or viability." because this is not what the theory states. In fact, an allele can be homozygous and cause hybrid sterility or decreased fitness (although this is difficult to have happen) because of its incompatibility with another homozygous allele from a different background. BDM describes something totally different from heterozygous disadvantage, namely that hybrid incompatibility arises from the interactions of alleles at two or more loci which arose independently in two allopatric populations. Dopeytaylor (talk) 16:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No longer an orphan page

[edit]

several pages link here, this has been removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dopeytaylor (talkcontribs) 16:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]