Jump to content

Talk:Bath, Maine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More history

[edit]

Surely there must be more history to a town like Bath! Pjmorse 14:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Climate

[edit]

Just posting to say the climate info is a bit suspicious. The link in the ref is down, so it can't be confirmed, but -49F is a little bit cold for coastal Maine. I could see it being real if it was very old data, like how Boston managed to get to -30F in 1857 but hasnt even come close in recent years. But the rest of the data is clearly for recent years. In fact, a lot of the other record lows seem surprisingly mild (never been colder than 1°F in November?? Or -10 in March?). So the data might be bad in general. But it's hard to find data for this particular town, for some reason.

It was present from the beginning, as seen here. Also suspicious because when far northern Maine got to -50F a few years ago nobody seemed to mention that the new record had only beaten Bath by a mere 1 degree. Moreover, prior to this new -50F record, the previous record low for the state had usually been reported as -48F, and that was also in the far north, perhaps Allagash, not a southern coastal location. The only real argument in favor of it being possible is that Portland, Maine is generally the warmest in the state during winter and even Portland managed to get to -39°F once in recent history, which is only 2 degrees warmer than the record low for Minneapolis. But the -39 in Portland and the -49 in Bath are for different months, so they can't both be from just one single freakishly strong cold wave. Soap 15:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.weather.com/weather/today/l/USME0021:1:US seems to suggest that the data is still lurking on weather.com somewhere but is no longer publicly accessible .... they only give you 3 months at a time, and only the averages, not the record highs and lows. (Though you can get record *daily* highs and lows, that's useless.) Soap 15:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More info: Bath did indeed get very cold once. Not –49°F, but –52°F way back in January 1857. In those days most thermometers used mercury, which freezes around -38F, and cant be the source of this measurement. But even then, there were thermometers that used ethanol, which can go down to -172F. Thus the –52°F in Bath is unofficial but quite possibly real. It just belongs to an era when even downtown Boston could get to -30 and New York City to around -25. The -39F in Portland Maine, however, is modern. Soap 18:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Bath, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bath, Maine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]