Talk:Batman: The Telltale Series

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (4 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (7 participants)
Stick Soldiers (1 participant)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (4 participants)
Sago Sago (3 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (3 participants; relisted)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (14 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Discord (rev)
Rayman M (rev)
Rain World (rev)
Fallout: New Vegas (nom)

Articles that need...

Comics: Batman Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Batman work group.

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Critical response summary[edit]

In this edit I removed the summary of the game's Metacritic evaluations. The summary of "positive" became "mixed and positive" in this edit, which then became mixed to positive. With the latter, we're getting into WP:SYNTH territory, as we're drawing a conclusion that is not expressly stated by any of the sources. I presume that no source called the response "mixed to positive". (Side note: While this is not a film article, "mixed to positive" is widely detested by WikiProject Film community for being an awful way to summarize critical response, and for it typically being derived through synthesis.) We aren't required by law to summarize the critical response. A perfectly rational approach might be to report the scores across the various platforms and let the reader figure it out. It is also worth noting that of the references in that section, two summarize the response as "mixed"[1]^(Archive)[2] and one summarizes it as generally favorable. So how it became "positive" is a bit sketchy on its own, and this guy from New Jersey seems to be responsible. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:50, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing here. Though it's clear that people really like to summarize stuff[3][4] this needs to be discussed. Review aggregators summarize aggregated critical response. In this article we've got three different summaries from Metacritic that we're trying to further aggregate and summarize. There's no point to this, and it's unclear what the major differences were between the various versions that would account for the disparity. One approach might be to summarize what each percentage means, ex: "The PlayStation 4 version received a score of 73/100 based on 19 reviews, indicating 'mixed or average reviews'" but to avoid mashing together the various reviews to arrive at a range summary. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Android/iOS[edit]

How Much is it? Are the listed dates correct? I cannot find the game on Google Play. --MK (talk) 12:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming sequel?[edit]

Do you think TTG will do an episodic sequel of this story? 2A01:CB05:8206:FB00:39A2:B80:B47A:6FD6 (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]