Talk:Battle of Adys/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 14:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I will start the review shortly.--Catlemur (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mention Tipps's full name just as you did with Bagnall.
I would like to, but they don't ever seem to have published or been referred to as anything other than "G.K.". The internet simply doesn't have a full name.
  • Note 5 is unrefenrenced.
Fixed.
  • Did the battle take place in 255 BC or 256 BC? The infobox and lede contradict each other.
My typo. Apologies. Fixed. Thanks.
  • "The Carthaginians pursuing chased the Roman force off the hill" - reword this sentence.

Done.

  • The infobox claims that there were probably 15,000+ Carthaginians, this is not mentioned explicitly in the Armies section.
Amended to the correct figure of 16,000+. The armies section states "the Carthaginians fielded 100 elephants, 4,000 cavalry and 12,000 infantry". It seems insulting to the reader to add "which totals over 16,000."


--Catlemur (talk) 21:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Catlemur, and many thanks for going through this. Your points addressed above. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Congratulations on another GA.--Catlemur (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Catlemur, I appreciate the review. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]