Talk:Battle of Ancona

A fact from Battle of Ancona appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the battle of Ancona was the only independent operation of the Polish II Corps in World War II?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/May.

Wikipedia

Military history: European / German / Italian / Polish / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	Polish military history task force
	World War II task force

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvements[edit]

I feel that this article could be improved by addressing the following:

complete the infobox by adding commanders and strength for German forces;
expand the text to discuss the battle in more detail
expand the lead.

Just a few ideas. If you would like more detailed comments, please consider submitting the article for peer review. This can be done by going to WP:MHPR. Once you feel it is ready for re-assessment, please add it to the list at WP:MHA. Good effort so far, by the way. — AustralianRupert (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I've added all the info from my singe source. Hopefully other sources will allow us to expand this further. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 12:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]