Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Bita Paka/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk) 07:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. AustralianRupert (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progression[edit]

  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review[edit]

  • no dabs found by the tools;
  • ext links all work;
  • alt text is present.

Comments[edit]

These are my suggestions for possible improvement:

Criteria[edit]

  • It is reasonably well written.y
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • Looks good, all issues above addressed.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • No issues.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • No issues.
  • No issues.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  • No issues.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
  • No real issues, but I think the licencing on "File:Colonel Holmes at Bitapaka (AWM A03147).jpg" could be tweaked. As it is published before 1923, the warning is not required. Probably just replace with "{{PD-US-1923}}". Also, it should probably eventually be moved to Commons, so if you add "|commons" to the PD-Australia tag it will eventually be moved.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail: