Talk:Battle of Blandford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBattle of Blandford has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Correct name?[edit]

The other references I've found call this the Battle of Blandford, named for a town next to Petersburg then (now part of Petersburg.--Parkwells (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blandford is the correct spelling, but I'm not sure that the article should be called that. Blandford was the spot of the first line of defense of Petersburg. But the fighting continued in Petersburg and beyond. Burntdog (talk) 15:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Blandford/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The Battle of Blandford (or Blanford), also called the Battle of Petersburg, a battle of the American War of Independence, took place near Petersburg, Virginia on 25 April 1781" - "The Battle of Blandford (or Blanford), also called the Battle of Petersburg, was a battle of the American War of Independence that took place near Petersburg, Virginia on 25 April 1781"
  • "about" - not a good word. "approximately" maybe?
  • "In a spirited battle, the outnumbered militia provided remarkably stiff resistance" - mind explaining what references give this as spirited and remarkably stiff, or is it just POV original research?
  • "Cornwallis' request" - "Cornwallis's request"; it's singular possessive, not plural possessive.
  • "before then, and then to" - "before then, and to".
  • "to take him on" - unencyclopaedic. "to defeat him" or "to challenge him". Ironholds (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've made edits to address some of these. Two points:
  • I've used "about" (as a qualifier of numerical values) without objection many times, including in articles that passed FAC; I don't think it's ever been called out as an inappropriate or unencyclopedit usage. If this is a case of WP:ENGVAR (which I'd like more info on if you think it is) I can change these usages.
  • I've removed "spirited" as a descriptor; I could probably justify it, but I don't have access to all the necessary sources right now. I note that the phrase "stiffer resistance" already appears in the article; I have provided a specific citation there.
Thanks for your feedback. Magic♪piano 01:25, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cool beans; give me a poke when the ones you haven't already addressed/commented on have been dealt with, and I'll take another look at the article. Ironholds (talk) 01:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've made all the needed changes; let me know if there's anything else. Magic♪piano 13:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Much better; passing now. Congratulations! Ironholds (talk) 14:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Blandford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Blandford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]