Talk:Battle of Cahuenga Pass

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force

Adding references[edit]

I have no idea how to add references and links to an article. I am still reading the tutorial. --Desertphile (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you need help placing referenced, you can place the raw references on the talk page (e.g. links, books and their authors, page numbers, articles, etc.) --Sigma 7 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

< ref > Last, First Name. ' ' Title ' '. Date. Retrieved Date. < / ref >.

Or just add a = = References = = section and bullet ( * ) your references there. -LlywelynII (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TONE issues[edit]

This article has 'em. -LlywelynII (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better sourcing needed[edit]

Much of the battle description and other information comes from a website, www.militarymuseum.org, which has no verifiable sourcing. RefImprove tag added to this section. WCCasey (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]