Talk:Battle of Grozny (1999–2000)

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 6, 2011, February 6, 2013, February 6, 2015, February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017, and February 6, 2020.

Military history: Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia: History / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Need the name of the Russian commander of the siege[edit]

Kazentsev was the overral Chechnya commander.

TOS-1 is not a flamethrower. It's just designeted as "flamethrower" in russian for organizational reason. INn fact its' a FAE rocket launcher. [[[User:Serg3d2|Serg3d2]]]

New links to the references[edit]

Could someone fix it please? --HanzoHattori 17:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPMILHIST BCAD assessment[edit]

I'm failing this on the referencing criterion -- it's mostly well cited, but there are some sections that cite no references at all. SHouldn't be difficult to bring back up to standards. -- Avocado (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shamil6.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Shamil6.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:Chechnya9268.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References on Chechen tactics needed[edit]

There are no references for the Chechen part of the section "Tactics", please state some — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.175.81.120 (talk) 21:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Battle of Grozny (1999–2000). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Grozny (1999–2000). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211121835/http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/03/03/russia.chechnya.01/ to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/03/03/russia.chechnya.01/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Grozny (1999–2000). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Grozny (1999–2000). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070315043234/http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/4105.html to http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/4105.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of "most destroyed city on Earth"[edit]

The stmt that the UN in 2003 called Grozny the "most destroyed city on Earth" is cited by many people, but so far I haven't been able to trace it any farther back than the BBC article cited here. So, strictly speaking, what we have so far should be, "The BBC says the UN called Grozny" etc. Anyone else get a source closer to the UN? Wegesrand (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We generally consider BBC News a reliable source on international affairs, so citing a BBC News report as currently done in the lede is fine. MPS1992 (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fake citation[edit]

32. Minefield massacre decimates Chechens, Associated Press, February 5, 2000

This source doesn’t exist. The link doesn’t go anywhere and the article doesn’t even appear in search engine results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:7720:A20:6915:24E6:A64A:24D5 (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]