Talk:Battle of Hastings/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So when did the English fleet disperse? On 8 September when Harold dismissed the local fyrd?
- Yep. Clarified in the text. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably better rephrased as: likely "was not used" at Hastings, likely did not happen at Hastings
- Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
on the Bretons division on Move link to first occurrence and add apostrophe for possessive.
- Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is awkward: The duke then led a counter-attack against the pursuing English forces which were killed, with some of them rallying on a hillock before dying.
- Changed to "The duke then led a counter-attack against the pursuing English forces, with some of them rallying on a hillock before dying." Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Typo: two brothers lead the pursuit
- Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Missing possessive? Although Orderic Vitalis figures are highly exaggerated
- Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Combine cites 41 and 42
- I assume you meant 40 and 41? They are actually two different footnotes - one is just the footnote and the other is the page and the footnote. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Need ISBN for Howarth
- Added. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pics appropriately licensed.
External links good, no Dabs.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen this - hoping to get to it tonight. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No rush.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, think I got them all. Let me know if you see anything else... Ealdgyth - Talk 18:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]