Talk:Battle of Ilomantsi (1944)

Military history: European / Nordic / Russian & Soviet / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Ensured that this article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class.

This article would benefit from: in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strength and casualties of the battle

As User:Tbma marked there a request for sources ie. the {{fact}} template i guess it might be better if these were properly discussed

From 'Ilomantsi - lopultakin voitto' book (Antti Juutilainen, Rauma 1994)

Soviet strength:

Soviet strength for the most of the battle consisted of 2 infantry divisions (289th and 176th of 32nd Army of Karelian front). What is known is that at least 289 had rocket artillery (Katyusha rocket launcher ?) support as well as several light armors (of T-26, T-60 and T-70 types). Nominal fighting strength of these formations alone would have been above 20 000. However it is known that Karelian front had been unable to fully replenish or man the units so average strength of a Karelian front division was roughly 7 400 men instead of nominal ~10 000 men. Also it is further noted that the Finnish delay tactics were apparently costly to the advance Soviet formation as at least one of the regiments (52nd of the 176th division) was roughly at 50% strength (1222 instead of nominal 2443) when the battle actually began.

Soviet strength was increased later with three marine brigades (3rd, ,69th and 70th), one armor brigade (29th) and 'special troops' (3 battalions from 1st separate construction brigade, I battery of 1237th heavy artillery regiment, 63rd Guards mortar/rocket artillery regiment, 280th & 898th mortar regiments). However all these formations were understrength and in some cases (having suffered casualties) clearly understrength. Also combat formations were deployed directly after long marches so they were fatigued even before engaging the Finns.

All in all 2 divisions, 3 marine brigades, 1 armor brigade, 3 artillery/mortar regiments, 3 infantry battalions. The Finnish source i used had no knowledge of the Russian actual strength. Nominal strength of the 2 divisions (10 000 x 2), 3 marine brigades (at least 3 000 x 3), 1 armor brigade (several thousand), 3 artillery regiments (all presumable having nominal strength at 2 000 - 3 000 men)... all in all the nominal strength of the the units of the 32nd Army that took part into the battle is much closer (perhaps even over) 40 000 men than 30 000 men.

Finnish losses:

Problem with getting an accurate number for Finnish losses is that the whole group/detachment R was a temporary formation consisting of 2 separate brigades (21st and Cavalry) and some auxiliary units. There is a 'complete' casualties list for the operation but this omits at least one or two days casualties (it ends just before the Soviets broke through the encirclement and escaped to east). It lists the casualties as 227 KIA, 1389 WIA. It includes the troops as how the left the unit roster (ie. some WIA's most likely ended up as KIA). In addition a separate list of Cavalry Brigade's losses mentions that it lost 249 (178) KIA, 1263 (1016) WIA, 52 MIA/POW (values inside the '()' are the ones included in the above casualties listing). Writer himself concludes that as an estimate the total losses (KIA + MIA + WIA + POW) from the Finnish side were 2 500.

Soviet losses:

Finnish source did not use Soviet data but instead relied on Finnish reports on Soviet losses. Which again cut off just before the Soviet retreat. Finns estimated Soviet losses as 'until 8.8.' as roughly 2800 men (926 KIA, 141 POW, unconfirmed KIA/WIA ~ 1750). In addition a unit commander remarked that on 9.8.1944 the Soviets lost additional 400 KIA and 45 POW. Which according to writer with usual assumption of 2 or 3 WIAs per one KIA/MIA ends up with estimate of 5 500 to 7 500 men.

As said both values (Finnish 2 500 and Soviet 5 500 - 7 500) are just writers own opinions or estimates, not solid facts. I hope some one else has better or more accurate sources than what i have used. - Wanderer602 (talk) 12:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Ilomantsi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121218061125/http://mekri.uef.fi/sotahistoria/ to http://mekri.uef.fi/sotahistoria/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Ilomantsi in the Winter War

I believe an article should be created for the Winter War battle at Ilomantsi in 1939. I propose that the name of the article be "Battle of Ilomantsi (1939)" and this article renamed to "Battle of Ilomantsi (1944)", per WP:MILNAME. The move would be made once the article has been created of course.

Thoughts? -Betelgeuse X (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support for this idea. At least from the point that the winter war article has the map where one direction of invasion is towards Ilomantsi, if this implies significance and notability for a new article. 86.50.68.196 (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple sources in both English and Finnish discuss the fighting in Ilomantsi during the Winter War. There's enough material to warrant a Wikipedia article in my opinion. Betelgeuse X (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]