Talk:Battle of Jarrab

Saudi Arabia Low‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Untitled[edit]

I have reverted the reference to the effects of Shakespear's death. (I agree that 'changed the couse of history' was a bit dramatic.) However the article is a bit pointless without this note. The Battle of Jarrab was not significant in any way EXCEPT for the death of Shakespear.

Shakespear was the Empire's point-man and only real link to Ibn Saud. Had he not died, it is likely the British would have armed Ibn Sa'ud and he rather than Hussein Ibn Ali would have let the British proxy war against the Turks - i.e. T. E. Lawrence and all of that would never have happened and perhaps there would have been a film called 'Shakespear of Arabia' :)

This is an established view and it really was one of those turning points in history. This is a view accepted by almost all orientalist historians, which please see by consulting the references listed for the Shakespear article, and the sub references contained in those references.Mrhawley 08:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]