Talk:Battle of Kabalo/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 20:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a well written article that exceeds the GA criteria in most areas. It's well written and covers the subject well. Sources are reliable, although I did not check any of the references. Seems pretty neutral although I don't know the subject area well enough to say for sure. Images are free, correctly tagged, and relevant.
The one thing that needs improvement about this article is reducing the length of the "Background" section, which dominates the article. Right now I don't think it passes the focus criterion because the article spends so much space on stuff that isn't directly related to the battle. buidhe 21:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: I've trimmed it down some, please have another look. The section is still rather large, but I think the background is necessary to give context for ONUC's authorisations and the European involvement in Katanga's gendarmerie. -Indy beetle (talk) 03:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think this is fine, at least for GA status, therefore passing. buidhe 03:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)