Talk:Battle of Les Sables-d'Olonne/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Display name 99 (talk · contribs) 17:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This is article very nicely done. I have only one comment. Under "Aftermath," the end of the last paragraph is not followed by a citation. I conjecture that the first citation in the next paragraph is meant to apply to that. However, I think it's customary to end each paragraph with a citation. It helps the reader be sure of which citation applies to what. Aside from that, everything looks good. Display name 99 (talk) 17:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Its more complicated than that I'm afraid, and its my fault for being forgetful. This was added to the article without a source a while ago by a usually reliable editor and I meant to ask him to provide a reference and I completely forgot. I just dropped a line on his talk page and hopefully we'll have a good source for this in the very near future. If not I'll delete it. Thanks for the review!--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Display name 99: Had some help with this, but a source has been located which clarifies the fate of the ships. Let me know if there is anything else you need. Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Its more complicated than that I'm afraid, and its my fault for being forgetful. This was added to the article without a source a while ago by a usually reliable editor and I meant to ask him to provide a reference and I completely forgot. I just dropped a line on his talk page and hopefully we'll have a good source for this in the very near future. If not I'll delete it. Thanks for the review!--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry for responding so late. Your ping didn't work for some reason. I'll pass it now. Display name 99 (talk) 21:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)