Talk:Battle of Maarat al-Numan (2012)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

POWs

There was an edit made yesterday which updated the number of pro Assad POWs to 20. However it has since been reverted without good reason. here is the link to the article which shows the PoW number.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2012/oct/15/syria-crisis-russia-denies-cluseter-bombs-live

Also casualty statistics in almost all other battle articles generally go downwards rather than along i.e. instead of 100 dead, 7 captured, it would be

100 dead

7 captured

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.214.218.33 (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reason was given in the edit summary. Read it. The 20 captured were captured in Khan Sheikhun not Marat. Khan Sheikhun is 20 kilometers from Marat and is a separate battle for a separate town. Also, the casualty statistics are not generally downwards. Yes there are articles where you have downwards statistics, but you also have instances where its written just 100 dead, 7 captured. Its not a general thing. Its all based on how an editor feels on doing it. And is actually more based on spacing and how much info there is. If there is a lot of info its downwards, if there isn't it's not. EkoGraf (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name of Battle

"The city had already been captured once before by the rebels, on 10 June, but was recaptured by the military in August"

Shouldn't the battle be called Third Battle of Maarat al-Nu'man then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.67.173.39 (talk) 09:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Maarrat al-Nu'man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141025174021/http://www.brecorder.com/top-news/1-front-top-news/85378-syria-rebels-cut-highway-to-northern-battlefields-.html to http://www.brecorder.com/top-news/1-front-top-news/85378-syria-rebels-cut-highway-to-northern-battlefields-.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]