Talk:Battle of Marianna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Union Victory?[edit]

Hmmm, I'm not sure how to describe my concern with that statement. While the Union may have over run the city, they had to call off their attack on Appalachicola (errr, sp?) as a result of this battle. Being from Marianna, I can tell you we play up that part of the battle alot more then they made off with our stores and horses. From the way they tell it in Marianna the main confederate objective was to hold the supply line, and technicly that they did. Could this be considered a draw, or even a confederate victory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.159.89.194 (talk) 15:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Marianna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]