Talk:Battle of Mogadishu (November 2007)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

according to our article, an insurgent is one who takes part in an uprising against established authority. Since Somalia has no government this is impossible. The linked news articles do nothing to clarify whose side the militia is on, or whether the people who dragged the ethiopian soldiers through the streets are associated with any organization or militia.

Wouldn't the Ethiopians be fighting the militia either way? Whose side is anyone on? Are citizens simply shooting Ethiopian soldiers by popular consensus? (That would not be an insurgency.) How do these clearly civilian casualties imply a battle has occurred?

My limited understanding of Somalia is that the most powerful organizations there are fundamentalist Islamic, anathema to neighboring powers and the Somalian public. So the interests of Ethiopia are best served by preventing anyone from organizing at all. Killing any civilian who seems likely to obtain power isn't really a battle or a war or an occupation... maybe it's just an oppression? Potatoswatter 18:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Possible copyright problem[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Mogadishu (November 2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]