Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Surabaya (1677)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will get to this shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead and infobox; all good
  • Section 1;
    • then routed a much larger royal army sent to suppress them in the October 1676 Battle of Gegodog in northeast Java; this sentence is vague, unable to catch the sense and flow, please reword
  • Section 2;
    • landed on 4 and 5 May -> landed on 4–5 May
    • Two VOC detachments – Indonesian companies led by Dutch captains – were sent; use unspaced em dashes
  • Section 3; all good
  • 9.9% confidence, violation unlikely
Excellent work, Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for the review. I've updated the article in accordance with your comments. Please take another look. HaEr48 (talk) 18:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]