Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Tskhinvali

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2010WikiProject peer reviewReviewed

Decisive Georgian defeat

[edit]

This battle resulted in a decisive Georgian defeat and dictated the situation and momentum of the war, It was extremely decisive, the editor removing this fact is Georgian them self showing a possible bias? I'm going to put this back in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaik10a (talkcontribs) 09:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Tskhinvali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Battle of Tskhinvali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Battle of Tskhinvali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referenced info removed

[edit]

@JonathanLeMathieu: the latest edit removed a paragraph of referenced information without any justification. If you believe that it violates the WP policies please explain your reasoning here. Alaexis¿question? 15:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Latest changes

[edit]

A massive edit has been done recently. I've tried to understand what has been added and what has been removed by looking at the diff. While most of the changes make sense, I noticed that some information has been removed without justification (e.g., the passage about the artillery exchange on August 2). Given the scale of the change, it's very hard to understand what else has been removed.

I appreciate the effort that went into this edit and I'm sure that most of the changes constitute improvements. Having said that, would it be possible to make the changes in a series of edits with appropriate edit summaries for the benefit of other editors? Alaexis¿question? 22:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Some text was unsourced at all. Some prose needed rewriting. What is there to discuss? Remember WP:AGF. UA Victory (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]