Talk:Bayesian hierarchical modeling

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 1 June 2014 by reviewer Joe Decker (talk · contribs).

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Someone made a link to a suspicious website[edit]

I accidentally clicked on the link http://www.allbookez.com/pdf/e1qdo/ on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bayesian_hierarchical_modeling&oldid=790833442 - the link was labelled as the second one linking supposedly to reference page for Andrew Gelman's Bayesian Data Analysis book. But the link, as one can see is some suspicious link.

I do not know if my computer is damaged by this - but before that, can anyone, any admin, check whether this site does/did cause damages, and edit this page accordingly? 2601:240:8100:708:9C4B:C4EC:49FD:527A (talk) 01:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why?[edit]

But the probability of selecting a red ball on the second draw given that the red ball has already been selected in the first draw is 0,...

Why? If we have urn with 2 red balls and 2 blue balls, after first drawing (red ball) urn contains 1 red ball and 2 blue, so probability of next red ball is 1/3, not 0. Jumpow (talk) 09:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uninterpretable Sentence[edit]

"The assumed occurrence of a real-world event will typically modify preferences between certain options." No offense intended to the writer, but I don't think anyone can hope to extract any meaning here unless they already know the rest of the topic. I hope someone will fix it up so it has a discernible meaning. For example "the assumed occurrence of a real-world event" means what? There exists an assumption by somebody that a particular real-world event occurred? "...will typically modify..." So now we have that an assumed occurrence, whatever that is, modifies something. What does it modify? "[P]references between certain options." This is now so vague as to be beyond interpretation.Chafe66 (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & Pasted content from another page[edit]

the section "Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model" is exact copy from

Nonlinear mixed-effects model - Wikipedia

Should both pages be update with a short description and "Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model" have its own page?

Braim (talk) 04:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]